During the conversations one of my sisters had asked me if I had heard of the “Heptonstall Coiners”, a notorious story from Yorkshire history. This then led to a conversation that a congregational member Geoff Little had mentioned about a visit to Birstall. His wife Megen grew up, as did I. It was a story about her cousin who died trying to rescue his friend from drowning. There is a plaque dedicated to his memory outside the Presbytery of the Catholic Church there and next to what used to Lionel and Dorothy’s sweet shop. Another favourite place from my childhood. My mum remembered the tragedy. We decided to look into it and eventually found an account. What was somewhat spooky about it was that Megan’s cousins surname was Heptonstall. We had just been talking about the Heptonstall coiners.
We shared many other stories and had a lovely time, there were so many connections in the conversations, not least between ourselves and our lives. We do not get enough opportunities to have these conversations. I left in great spirits. My outer world had touched my inner world deeply as our inner worlds had shared so much with one another.
Connections and coincidences have been on my mind quite lot of late. I’ve been thinking about meaningful coincidence and synchronicities, times when the inner life and outer life are in synch. At such times the whole of life seems to be speaking to me constantly. I am going through a time that feels much like this of late. I feel I am in good relationship with life external to me, my inner life and that spirit that runs through life, that I name God.
The spiritual life is about relationship. We need to be in what I have often heard called right relationship, with ourselves, with others and with whatever it is we believe connects all of life, what is often called the Divine, to live spiritually alive.
I can usually get a good measure as to where I am at spiritually by simply checking where I am at relationally with myself, with others and with God, they are all interconnected and interrelated. Do I see myself in others and do I see others in myself. I have felt a deepening connection in recent weeks and as a result I am experiencing meaning and meaningful coincidence in and through life.
I recently came across a fascinating coincidence. It involves a character who is just a couple of years younger than my mum, Dennis the Menace. On the 12th of March he will be 75 years old. Now you may well ask which Dennis, the one from the Beano or the American comic strip. Well, the answer is both. Yes, unbelievably both characters first appeared in print on the 12th March 1951. Neither knew about each other as the characters were being developed and they were published independently without either influencing the other. Both Dennis’s are pranksters, who get themselves into trouble. The British Dennis is a true Menace, where as the American version seemingly gets himself into trouble by accident. Both Dennis’s were given their names independently. The Beano’s editor George Moonie got the name of the British Dennis from the lyrics of a “Music Hall” song "I'm Dennis the Menace from Venice". The American Dennis was created by illustrator Hank Ketcham, who based his character on his son who, would you believe, was called Dennis!
The British Dennis the Menace, created for The Beano, is officially dated 17 March 1951 as the comic's cover date, but copies were on sale from 12 March 1951 - the same day Ketcham's strip appeared. When the coincidence was discovered both creators agreed not to go to war over the name, there was no plagiarism disputes, although the British Dennis goes by a slightly different name in the US “Dennis and Gnasher.” The 75th Anniversary here in the UK is being celebrated in many ways. One being a special 50p coin being specially made in colour with Dennis and his black and red striped shirt, by the Royal Mint.
When I discovered this coincidence the other day, I was reminded of another similar one, that I was told about when I was a student minister. This was that the American Unitarian Association and the British and Foreign Unitarian Association began on the very same day the 26th May 1825, 200 years ago. This was a coincidence, but it does highlight a shared, yet largely independent development of liberal theology on both sides of the Atlantic. Interesting how their outer and inner worlds came into synch on exactly the same date. What is the meaning in such coincidence?
Now of course this maybe just total coincidence and random chance. Like people say even a stopped clock is right twice a day. My rational mind certainly believes that. Having said that I am one of those people who does feel at times that everything seems to be connected and when I am in tune with this I see such coincidences everywhere. It feels like life is communicating with me. I experience the Divine speaking to me through life. My inner life and my outer life are at one.
Now some folk have called this Synchronicity. According to Phil Cousineau "Synchronicity is an inexplicable and profoundly meaningful coincidence that stirs the soul and offers a glimpse of one's destiny."
Most folk talk of experiencing moments of synchronicity. Such as the anticipation of a phone call from a person just seconds before it rings; the chance meeting with someone from the past who has the answer we have been looking for; that feeling of deep connection with someone when something happens to them although they are physically miles apart, we feel their pain and or joy deeply. It is these feelings, if we pay attention to them, that will call us to engage with life in deeper more meaningful ways. If we do more meaning and intuitive connection emerges. This is certainly my experience, although not always a good one. Several people have been speaking to me of such experiences quite a lot recently. Now is this happening more frequently or am just aware of this currently. Is it because my out and inner world are in synch? Who knows!
The psychologist Carl Jung coined the phrase synchronicity in an attempt to explain what he called "meaningful coincidences ", that occur due to seemingly unrelated events. His concept of synchronicity came about through the many baffling coincidences his patients shared with him in his practice, especially as he began to realize that the occurrences went beyond what could be attributed to mere chance. His interest has also been attributed to a series of conversations, over many years, that he had with Albert Einstein.
Synchronicity suggests that events we experience as human beings are more than mere chance, that there is more going on; that we humans and all of life are connected and at a deeper level than would outwardly appear. Suggesting that who we are, what we think, feel, imagine, react to, are interrelated with the things going on around us in our environment; that at times who and what we are, how we appear to be to others and how, who, and what they are and how they appear to us converge together. Our inner and outer worlds are in synch.
Here is a wonderful reflection by Parker J Palmer on “The Mobius Strip”.
“Life on the Möbius Strip” by Parker J. Palmer
Here’s a brief meditation on life on the Mobius strip, a curious concept to be sure, but no more curious than life itself!
This curious object is a Möbius strip.
If you take your index finger and trace what seems to be the outside surface, you suddenly find yourself on what seems to be the inside surface. Continue along what seems to be the inside surface, and you suddenly find yourself on what seems to be the outside surface.
I need to keep saying “what seems to be” because the Möbius strip has only one side! What look like its inner and outer surfaces flow into each other seamlessly, co-creating the whole. The first time I saw a Möbius strip, I thought, “Amazing! That’s exactly how life works!”
Whatever is inside of us continually flows outward, helping to form or deform the world — depending on what we send out. Whatever is outside us continually flows inward, helping to form or deform us — depending on how we take it in. Bit by bit, we and our world are endlessly re-made in this eternal inner-outer exchange.
Much depends on what we choose to put into the world from within ourselves — and much depends on how we handle what the world sends back to us. As Thomas Merton said:
“We don’t have to adjust to the world. We can adjust the world.”
Here’s the question I’ve been asking myself ever since I understood that we live our lives on the Möbius strip:
“How can I make more life-giving choices about what to put into the world and how to deal with what the world sends back — choices that might bring new life to me, to others, and to the world we share?”
Now as you are no doubt aware Parker is one of my favourite human beings, one of my ministerial inspirations. I love how he connects the inner and outer world, it speaks powerfully to my condition, as Quakers like Parker would say. He suggests that “The Mobius Strip” is a useful metaphor for our inner and outer lives. How these are interrelated and how they affect each other. He claims that the onstage life is how we appear in the world, how we impact on the world, what he describes as the ego questions. While the backstage life is more about intuition and instinct and value and faith. These are those deeper aspects of ourselves, what is called soul, that greater reality that makes who we truly are. He claims that we are born in wholeness. That there is no separation between our inner and outer lives but as time goes by and we become increasingly influenced by the external world we lose touch with our souls and disappear into our roles. He suggests that as we grow up into the world we realise that it is not safe to be our backstage selves in the onstage world, that we somehow have to hide who we truly are and we begin to build a wall of separation. This he says becomes painful due to the disconnect between the inner and the outer life. Due to this, for so many, often the spiritual seekers, there is the desire to bring our lives into the classic shape of the circle. Which he says means I want what is important to me internally to be the values by which my external life which surrounds revolves. Thus, bringing a sense of unity to my life. Thus, my external life becomes authentic as I become centred.
Palmer acknowledges that this "centering" is a step forward and I personally see that this is where so much contemporary spirituality takes us, the kind that frustrates me. The problem with it is in the circle itself, it’s a kind of circling of the wagons, a wall of separation a kind of spiritual “gated community”, a walled garden of myself, that nothing and no one can touch. Yes, we create our own sanctuary that no one can enter, unless of course they agree with us. Those who do not share our core beliefs and principles are excluded, thus avoiding the messiness and trouble of such relationships. This circle he suggests is just another kind of wall of separation and protection and does not in the end solve the real problem that we all suffer from, it feeds the sense of separation and does not truly allow for a deep spiritual intimacy that we all crave, it does not bring about true wholeness true relationship with ourselves, with others and with God.
Palmer suggests that there is another way, an alternative, which allows us to be both authentic and open. It is achieved by reshaping into the “Mobius Strip” which has the feature of being continuous and unbroken. By simply tracing your finger around what appears to be the outside of the surface you soon find yourself on what appears to be the inside of the surface. As you continue round you soon find yourself on what appears to be the outer part of the strip. He says that it only appears this way because one of the key features of the “Mobius strip” is that there is no inner and outer the two seem to co-create each other. That this is how life is. That whatever is inside us mergers with what is outside and vice versa and both influence each other and in that exchange, interaction, coming together we co-create what we call reality.
This Palmer says leads to one question that ultimately we have to ask “As I travel this Mobius strip between my onstage life and my backstage life, constantly co-creating, how can I become so aware of that exchange that co-creative transaction, moment by moment, that I can increasingly make choices about it that are life giving rather than death dealing?”
For Palmer this is the question that links the inner life with the outer life. It is this that brings that sense of connection of oneness and brings us closer together. It is this that brings the pieces of the jigsaw together and begins to bring about completeness maybe one day, that yokes all life together, that is Yoga. In so doing we return to the wholeness, the natural state, in which we were born. Or perhaps to put it more religiously we return to paradise, we return to the natural state, the original goodness and blessing into which we were born. We find completeness. We create the Kingdom of God, the Kin-dom of Love, right here right now.
So to answer Palmer’s question “How do we make choices that are life giving rather than death dealing?”
Well it really does depend on what we put into the world and what we take in too.. It is about how we relate to one another, to life and to our inner selves. It’s about relationships. It’s about not building walls of self-protection, that soon become isolation, that cuts us off from everything, unless we agree 100% with it or them 100% of the time, in which case we will find ourselves completely alone.
It’s about learning to dance on the Mobius strip. This is the spiritual life, both personal and in community. This is integration of both personal and communal. This to me is purpose of communities such as the ones I serve, imperfect free religious communities. This is how we develop relationships that are healthy and live affirming. Relationships with our true selves, one another and whatever we believe is at the heart of all life. This is how we live spiritually alive. In so doing it can some times feel that the whole of life is speaking to us.
May we find ways to live and dance on the mobius strip.





